Letters to the editor

February 11, 2025

In response to Marty Martin’s letter of February 5

In response to Marty Martin’s letter (2/05), YES! Citizens for a Beautiful Saugerties is indeed “one-sided,” as are the supporters of the proposed rezoning of Winston Farm. We are well aware that the Winston Farm property is zoned for residential development. What we oppose is the (disingenuous) plan to rezone it as proposed, on the grounds that the environmental destruction would be unconscionable at any time but particularly at this time of devastating global climate change, biodiversity loss, threatened ecological zones and endangered fresh water supplies. This is the way the planet dies, 850 acres at a time.

Mr. Martin says that people who support preservation, either the Town of Saugerties or some non-profit, could have purchased the property themselves but missed the boat. If another group without deep pockets had been able to get the fantastic deal that the current owners got on the property, it might well have been purchased and preserved long ago.

Letters to the editor

November 6, 2024

Good for the land and good for the people

Marty Martin’s characterization of Beautiful Saugerties (HV1, 10/30/24) as “angry” is erroneous and uninformed. Beautiful Saugerties is not angry but deeply concerned about the massive overdevelopment proposed by the current owners of Winston Farm in their application for rezoning. What Beautiful Saugerties strongly supports is the preservation of as much of the property, intact, as possible, under the terms of the current or any future zoning.

The Winston Farm ecosystem  is too valuable to the local environment and, in its small way, to the much larger, global picture of the health of the entire planet as well. Our literal survival as a community, a civilization, and possibly as a species depends on minimizing, preferably ending, the destruction of nature, on which human survival depends, in the name of the false promises of economic growth. And in fact, Saugerties’ Comprehensive Plan (a legally binding document) requires that 73% of the property remain as open space no matter what else is built there. Beautiful Saugerties is working to ensure that adherence to that plan results in undisturbed  woodland, wetland, meadow, habitat and water supply, and beyond that, that any development that occurs be done with the lightest possible footprint and the greenest available technology.

Letter to the editor

October 23, 2024

Winston Farm development plan — a better alternative

I imagine the rain water that came down recently, making its way into aquifers, wells and the roots of trees. I also picture the impervious hard surfaces the development of Winston Farm (WF) will result in. These hard surfaces will increase runoff from rain storms and take water from our trees, aquifers and wells. This phenomenon is happening all over the country where natural habitats are being replaced by parking lots.

The development plan presented in the Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement (DGEIS — August, 2024) has sections on potential mitigation measures to reduce the damage done by the loss of trees and natural habitats. The word mitigate is very telling. It admits to the potential damage that may occur but don’t worry, these measures will lessen its impact. How much damage will occur to the WF environment, even with the “mitigation” strategies? No one is quite sure. At the August 14, 2024 Saugerties Town Board meeting, community members were told that the success or failure of the development plan might not be known for ten years. We know now, the development plan will irreparably change our WF treasure. 

There is a simpler solution to the development plan and the mitigation dilemma. Leave WF alone to enrich our lives. No mitigation needed to counteract the transformation done by thousands of asphalt-covered parking spaces.There is an alternative plan for WF presented by Permaculture expert, Andrew Faust, “Winston Farm/An Alternative Vision: A Community Farm & Forest Preserve.” This plan was presented to the Saugerties Town Board at its September 18 meeting. The character of our community is hanging in the balance.

People come to Saugerties not for a boutique hotel, but for its beauty, the autumn leaves, the fresh air, and the Hudson River, not to be stuck in traffic with thousands of additional cars and their exhaust. 

Letter to the editor

October 16, 2024

Rebutting Ward Todd's Winston Farm Op-Ed: Letter By Margarita Asiain

To the Editor: The recent opinion piece written by Ulster County Chamber of Commerce's President and CEO, Ward Todd, regarding the Winston Farm Development project begs for a few responses and questions.

The Saugerties Chamber of Commerce is reportedly remaining neutral on the project. Who then is the UC Chamber representing with its apparent endorsement?

Mr. Todd has a fast and loose use of the word "facts." The fact is, the "facts" in the Draft Generic Environmental Impact Review currently under review by the Town Board means they are subject to being scrutinized for accuracy and adequacy and to being disputed. The "facts" remain to be determined. Even a cursory review of the DGEIS, which is publicly available, shows many areas that are inadequate or missing critical information.

Yes, the owners are local, respected benefactors in Saugerties. Yes, their businesses are part of Saugerties’ character and contribute to the local culture. Yes, they are proven responsible business owners. But they have been clear that they will not develop the property themselves. The goal is to sell the property in parcels; whoever the developers are, they will almost certainly not be local, and there is no way of foreseeing whether their designs will be in keeping with Saugerties character and culture.

Supporting arguments for development always include that the benefits will be that taxes will go down and that tax bases will increase to benefit the town. This is more a theory that often doesn't work out in practice. It is incumbent on the owners to provide evidence of where this has worked rather than merely saying that it will.

As we talk about the need for creating jobs, Kings Highway and Malden Turnpike, both zoned for business, have space for development. We have a conference center already at Diamond Mills. We have hotels already, and campgrounds. There are other spaces for housing development.

Letters to the editor

October 10, 2024

Do we want a ghost town?

Has the impact on the Village of Saugerties by the mega-development of Winston Farm been sufficiently assessed? Do we want a ghost town?

Meyer Rothberg
Saugerties

Heartbroken

I am writing to express my feelings regarding using Winston Farm to promote monetizing the natural world.

I am heartbroken over the dramatic disregard for this precious resource.

Yes, people need housing, recreation and all that temporary stuff, but the land here must endure.

I can’t speak to the details of this project, because I don’t care about that. I only recognize beauty and the life that exists. This project will impair our world and will reverberate into the future 

Please leave Winston farm as a huge parcel of beauty and a gift to all.

Susan Towlson
Saugerties

Saugerties development and a growing safety concern

Over the past couple of days, Saugerties has seen multiple car accidents, one even involving a first responder en route to help at another crash site. These accidents are alarming on their own, but even more so in the context of the continued push for overdevelopment in our town. With the Winston Farm proposals that would add an extreme amount of housing and entertainment units, I can’t help but ask: what are we doing to our community?

Saugerties is already feeling the strain. In recent years, we’ve added significant developments — Summit on Hudson and the unfinished condos by Diamond Mills along 9W, Country Meadow Apartments on North Street and a new neighborhood of single-family homes off Glasco Turnpike. This, on top of a road system that seems increasingly unable to handle the traffic. The recent accidents make it painfully clear that we’re pushing beyond what our infrastructure can safely accommodate.

Letter to the editor

September 24, 2024

Winston Farm: a better plan, revealed

Permaculture expert Andrew Faust’s presentation at the September 18 Saugerties Town Board meeting was impressive and inspiring: a regional food hub consisting of a regenerative farm, including intensive vegetable production plus a small dairy,  as well as a “food forest” of nut trees. This is a use for Winston Farm that looks to the needs of the actual future, working with nature instead of against it, as the currently proposed mixed-use commercial/residential development would do by bulldozing and paving large parts of the property.

Experienced in the development of such sites, Faust was confident that the funding required to get the project up and running would be found following the purchase of the property by a not-for-profit land conservancy. It’s known that the State of New York is interested in such a project as part of the state parks system. Furthermore, the project itself would create jobs for people who want to turn their hand to farming as well as the many other kinds of jobs required to keep a large agricultural operation going and create housing for those who work on the property, potentially hundreds of people.

Letters to the editor

September 10, 2024

The “highest and best use of the land:” An alternative vision for Winston Farm

Lately, I’ve been hearing that people who oppose the rezoning of Winston Farm in Saugerties are some kind of tree-hugging idealists who stubbornly refuse to consider any kind of development of the property. Let’s get something straight. No one is seriously proposing that “nothing happen” at Winston Farm. This idea is being weaponized by people who wish to present a false “all or nothing” choice or who may actually be confused. But even if a few forward-thinking citizens like me believe that nature knows best, we don’t dare to dream that Winston Farm could be left to nature in the world we’ve actually created, motivated by profit and growth, both of which are leading us over the cliff of environmental and economic collapse.

In fact, however, there is an alternative vision, one which aligns with “the highest and best use of the land” (if use it we must) and cooperates with nature’s purposes of keeping the air clean and the water abundant, of sequestering carbon, and of increasing biodiversity. It’s called regenerative agriculture, a method which creates and improves topsoil instead of paving it over. Relying on permaculture methods of food production, it would place Winston Farm as a key part of the bioregional food production effort we are going to rely on in the near-enough future, as the economy (including the global supply chain which stocks our supermarkets) continues to collapse and the climate continues to change beyond recognition.

Seriously, everybody, how much longer do you think this American joyride is going to continue? Food security is going to be paramount any day now, and we’re going to have to grow what we need within our bioregion. The vision held by the current owners of Winston Farm is one of a future in which everything looks the same as it does now, only more so. But that’s not the future seen by better-informed people who aren’t captured by the no-longer-tenable myth of perpetual growth or the false promises of Wall Street, corporate America and our own government. We see a planet on which nature needs all the help she can get. What’s proposed for Winston Farm offers only destruction.

Letter to the editor

September 3, 2024

Winston Farm project would destroy quality of life in Saugerties

A hard truth, that some people still don’t get: We cannot continue to build, pave, destroy habitat, deplete aquifers in the name of growth, development and profit, destroying the very fabric of the Earth on which we depend.

Winston Farm is a perfect microcosm of the challenge we face. The developers want their profit, the Town Board its potential tax base. The American Way! But growth and profit at what

cost?

Saugerties is already choking on traffic. Its aquifers are strained and always in danger of contamination. Houses stand empty, because it’s not profitable to rehab them.

Now there’s a proposal to build 133 homes, 115 townhouses, 800 apartments, a campground with 157 cabins and RV sites, 425,000 square feet of retail, a 150-room hotel, a conference center/300-room hotel, a 5,000-person amphitheater, and 375,000 square feet of industrial space on what is now woodland and fields.